Comments (14)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

1. Mav says:

   May 10, 2011 at 2:26 am

   scarlett only 14th?
   • Balls Mcgillicutty says:

     May 10, 2011 at 2:49 am

     Reverse that and you have Vanessa Hudgens’ number. She should be top ten. Katy isn’t a bad choice for 1 though.
     • haha says:

       May 10, 2011 at 5:51 am

       With such a ugly face and her tranny legs Vanessa shouldn’t be on this list at all.
       • Balls Mcgillicutty says:

         May 10, 2011 at 5:53 am

         Ah hell no you best be tollin.
2. Anonymous says:

   May 10, 2011 at 3:48 am

   Why aren’t your pics in order? LOL
3. Billy says:

   May 10, 2011 at 5:24 am

   Katy Perry as #1 what a joke of a list
4. arandomninja says:

   May 10, 2011 at 6:00 am

   it’s absolutely criminal for zooey deschanel to be so far down on the list.
   • Charles says:

     May 11, 2011 at 12:51 am

     idk…i wouldn’t consider zooey as all that “sexy”. However, i think she is beautiful. So if it were the 100 most beautiful women, i would hope she would be higher up my list. But that of course is just my opinion.
5. Scorp says:

   May 10, 2011 at 6:31 am

   Ehm. No one realised that Katy Perrys Tattoo is shoped away?

   Look here:
   http://images.hotcelebshome.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Katy-Perry-43.jpg
6. Laredo says:

   May 10, 2011 at 8:50 am

   The proper name should be FHM UGLIEST WOMEN. Yesterday there was another FHM list. Totally different. Funny, isn’t it?
7. mike says:

   May 10, 2011 at 11:30 pm

   So nobody remembers the Katy Perry morning pic without her face paint?
8. Charles says:

   May 11, 2011 at 12:44 am

   …really? lady gaga?
9. Natural says:

   May 11, 2011 at 12:49 am

   long live the clown face! shame on you aussies!
10. Jayceon says:

    May 11, 2011 at 5:42 pm

    Nicole Only 94? And Miley Cyrus 54! You Must Be Kidding FHM! you Should Name It 100 Top B!tchez if you wanna put miley over someone like nicole!